Hinckley Estates Residential Subdivision

Expressed concern that a 6-lot scenario would extinguish existing right-of-way access easements and questioned the tight 4-foot setbacks and driveway placement relative to property corners.

Objected to the 6-lot concept study, noting no one in the neighborhood wants six lots, and asked for clarification on civil engineering drawings.

Expressed deep affection for the Hinkley family and their land but questioned whether a PUD creating a pocket park with 4-foot setbacks was appropriate, warning it would destroy the mature forest canopy and privacy.

Shared historical context about neighborhood covenants and expressed distress that the proposed PUD setbacks do not align with the spirit of the original neighborhood agreements.

Suggested that a simpler 80-foot lot subdivision under standard zoning would avoid PUD complications and better match the lot widths on Floribunda Drive.

Spoke in support of the PUD, thanking the city and commission while noting the family's long stewardship of the land and the desire to pass it to grandchildren.

Thanked Gene Hinkley for preserving the land for 20 years and expressed happiness to see it pass to her grandchildren.

Expressed concern that foundation excavation and 8-foot setbacks would destroy the green wall of trees along the property line.